In "The Proud Scientific Ignorance of a Christian Nationalist," Gutsick Gibbon dismantles Doug Wilson's scientific misconceptions with precision. Her analysis reveals Wilson's blatant misunderstandings of evolution and geology, underscoring a troubling blend of ignorance and confidence. This isn’t just a critique; it’s a wake-up call about the dangerous spread of misinformation.
Ken Ham's insistence that feathered dinosaurs are merely birds continues to be an obsession of his. His claims rely on selective evidence and misunderstanding of scientific theories. The robust connections between dinosaurs and birds, supported by extensive fossil records like Eosinopteryx, continue to undermine his arguments, revealing a clear ideological bias rather than intellectual rigor.
Young-earth creationist claims about nature's design fall flat when examined closely. The intricacies of the Southern Masked Weaver and countless species challenge the notion of a simple divine creation. The required "hyper-evolution" to account for bird diversity post-Noah is a contradiction that shatters their credibility and exposes their flawed logic.
How did vultures, roadrunners and horny lizards obtain their uniquely deserted-adapted traits? In my most recent video I review one answer provided by the Institute for Creation Research (ICR) titled “Christ's Creativity in Canyon Critters.” Johnson, who holds a law degree and a theology degree, frequently writes about biology for ICR. https://youtu.be/c-ts_KAJy4U?si=2pMvQDpihSTG3rqv The article begins... Continue Reading →
The video explores the possibility of Adam and Eve having tails, challenging the views of creationists like Ken Ham. It delves into the genetic and morphological aspects of tail development, highlighting a study in the journal 'Nature" that suggests a genetic mutation responsible for the absence of tails in humans and great apes. The content encourages a dialogue on the interpretation of creation narratives and the integration of scientific understanding with theological beliefs.
As an adult, you have experienced an astounding number of mutations during your lifetime – several quadrillion, to be specific. This number may seem unfathomable, but it's true. It's natural to wonder how you're still alive with such an immense number of mutations. How do we even know how many mutations have occurred in our... Continue Reading →
Ken Ham, the founder of Answers in Genesis USA, has no doubts about the proper classification of birds and dinosaurs. He believes that identifying birds a type of dinosaur should be rejected and labeled a compromised view, influenced by evolutionary theory. However, it would appear he has no problem considering whales and bats to be... Continue Reading →
Ken Ham has fired the first of what, apparently, will be many volleys against what he believes is one of the biggest threats to young-earth creationists: other young-earth creationists!! hanging them with the pejorative title of "young-earth evolutionists." Yes, Ken Ham is suggesting that one of the biggest danger to creationism--as defined by Answers in... Continue Reading →
Natural Selection can be difficult to observe in natural populations. In the video linked below I examine a fascinating example of possible adaptation via natural selection of cliff swallows to the challenge of fast-moving vehicles in their environment. In the paper we will examine it was observed that over a period of 30 years, the... Continue Reading →
How did the incredible species diversity today manifest itself from just a few individual animals preserved on Noah's Ark? How much speciation has happened? What are the mechanisms for young-earth speciation? Is there evidence that rapid speciation has occurred in just the past few thousand years? These are enduring questions that young-earth creationists have been... Continue Reading →
Ken Ham recently tweeted about a baby born with a "tail." I agree with his assessment that these are not cases of bony tails, homologous to tails in almost all vertebrate species, but then I wondered, can young-earth creationists be sure that Adam and Eve did not have true bony tails as adults? After all,... Continue Reading →
Reading and understanding original research publications can be difficult when the content is outside your field of expertise. Sometimes reading that original research is just avoided and popular summaries are used to inform us of the importance of new research. The latter appears to be the case when Ken Ham writes about his love of... Continue Reading →
Young-earth creationists in the twenty-first century take a broadly inclusive view of the relationship of existing and extinct species as they relate to the kinds of organisms that God created one days four, five, and six of the creation week. For example, the image below is from a new display of the origin of the... Continue Reading →
Young-earth creationists like to talk about two types of evolution, one is real (microevolution), and the other is a lie from the pit of hell (macroevolution). They act as if their were a chasm between the two as large as the Grand Canyon. But when their literature is explored identifying where microevolution ends and macroevolution... Continue Reading →
When the Creation Museum in Kentucky opens back up on June 8 they will have a new exhibit on great ape origins. There you will be able to learn how all gorillas, orangutans, chimpanzees and all species of fossil apes including australopiths share a common ancestor no more than 4500 years ago. Ken Ham has... Continue Reading →
Naturalis Historia 