In a critical examination of Dr. Mathison’s article on theistic evolution, I emphasize the need for careful research on both sides of the evolution debate. I highlight the limitations of Dr. Mathison's arguments, particularly his reliance on Intelligent Design proponents, and encourage a deeper Reformed engagement with modern evolutionary science while adopting a humble posture toward uncertainties in understanding origins.
What a New Grand Canyon Study Really Says—and Why Creationists Will Misrepresent It
The Grand Canyon's origins have stirred debate among scientists and creationists. A recent study by He et al. utilizes zircon analysis to demonstrate that the Colorado River's sediments appeared in the Bidahochi basin approximately 6.6 million years ago, leading to a lake spillover event. This finding challenges young-earth creationist interpretations of rapid canyon formation, highlighting significant geological timelines and processes.
Apples, Oranges, and Genomes: A Critique of Dr. Carter’s Claims about Human-Chimpanzee Genetic Similarity
In a battle of genetics, Dr. Rob Carter boldly claims humans are 10-15% genetically different from chimpanzees, challenging evolutionary biology and endorsing Biblical creation. However, this sensational rhetoric relies on confusing metrics and ignores critical comparative data.
Stranger Things–Creationist’ Views of Speciation and Natural Selection in the 1980s
Today, young-earth creationists are actively promoting a new model of the origin of the diversity of life on Earth. This speculative view borrows a number of elements found in any typical evolutionary biology textbook. For example, modern YECs claim that most and possibly all species alive today—except humans—are related to numerous other, though not all,... Continue Reading →
What is a “Kind”? Fox News Article Quoted by AiG Speakers Contradicts their own Definition
I have said before that reading young-earth literature or attending one of their seminars can be a confusing experience. Â Many times they present internally inconsistent arguments seemingly unaware of how one thing they say contradicts something another creationist has said or even what they have said themselves. Â For example, on the November 29th edition of... Continue Reading →