You may have seen reports of the discovery of the “British Atlantis” circulating the web. Those stories seem to have been sparked by a new display of recent research at the Royal Society and especially this article which has some good images. Briefly, what has been found is further evidence that between Great Britain and western Europe there used to be no sea but dry land that was inhabited by a community of ice-age animals and plants including probably human populations. This is not a new idea but new technology and renewed human efforts have led to the discovery of much more evidence to support this hypothesis. I find the articles to be too fluffy and so it is difficult to say how certain we can be that what is now the sea floor was inhabited by communities of people and not just plants and other animals but it seems quite certain that Great Britain and Europe were connected by dry land in the past.
How this past connection happened is quite clear: during the maximum extent of ice during the last ice age the worlds oceans were 350 to 400 feet lower than they are today. As a result large sections of continental shelf which today are covered by shallow seas, would have been dry ground. This includes large areas between Britain and Denmark parts of which have been given the name Doggerland.
Over the past 50 years fishermen have inadvertently brought up 100s of artifacts that date to 8 to 10 thousand years old including stone implements and spears and axes made from antlers of extinct animals (See article from Nature with more details). Now that a better map of the area has been made those finds can be mapped to see if ancient villages can now be identified. For example, this more recently announced map of the area apparently has identified some mounds of possible human origin that will be investigated in the future. Cores from the soils underlying the sands deposited in the English Channel suggest swamps and hills with vegetation that was very much like the rest of Europe during the ice age. The land was cold and probably fairly baren like Britain at the height of the ice age (20,000 years by conventional dating) and then as the world warmed Doggerland would have filled with vegetation and ice age animals very quickly. But not long after becoming habitable the sea levels would have continued to rise dramatically over several thousand years resulting in the flooding of this entire area. By 8500 years ago or so nearly this entire region would have been submerged and the coastlines of Britain nearly established. Part of the problem in describing the former geography and biota of this area is that when this land was gradually reclaimed by the ocean it would have been eroded in many areas removing evidence of what it was like. Now that the water is hundreds of feet deep in most places several meters of new sediments have been deposited on much of the area also obscuring the past. Various forms of radar and scans are allowing the subsurface layers to be examined and cores from oil drilling have also revealed more artifacts that allow for this new picture of what it was like in Doggerland long ago.
Creationism and Doggerland?
I haven’t seen any young earth creationists response to this yet but I don’t think they will find the possibility of people living here particularly concerning. After all, they believe there was an ice age after the global flood so people could have lived there a short time before being displaced. The evidence of what sorts of plants and animals lived there (mastodons and other ice-age mammals) and the lack of technology by the first human inhabitants raises persistent questions that are rather poorly addressed in the creation literature. However, I’m not that interested in these questions. I find that Doggerland raises a much more interesting historical phenomena that is not well appreciated: dramatic sea level change and its effects globally on human populations.
Sea levels 300 to 400 feet below their current levels mean that the shape of the earth’s continents would have been very different in the past. As a result people living at this time, if they were at all dependent on the sea for their living, would have very likely lived in places that no longer are above sea level. So we are missing a record of a great number of people because it is lost to the sea. In the case of Doggerland we may yet find some evidence left over of people s existence but for many we will never know of their lives. One place we know people lived that is now underwater is off the coast of Florida. There are numerous native american occupation sites that have been identified in the Gulf of Mexico in areas that would have been above sea level during the last Ice Age. These sites tell us much more about human dispersal around the globe.
The Ice Age vs Human Migration: A challenge for young earth creationism
I wanted to just take a few minutes to explore the implications of these two sites on the model creationists have for explaining human dispersal after the flood. Obviously for YECs, the global flood represents an extreme bottlenecking of the human populations. What is less often recognized is that from my reading, nearly all young earth creationists believe in a second restriction on human migration patterns. This is the bottleneck of the Tower of Babel. Their reading of Scripture tells them that “all” mankind was present at the Tower of Babel and so any evidence of populations of people anywhere must result from the dispersal of people from the Tower of Babel. When did that occur? This is not clear in the Scriptures but it seems that 150 to 400 years after the Flood is the most commonly accepted time-frame to place it. As a result, the Egyptian, Chinese, native American etc.. timelines must all have their starting point after this event. So it isn’t just that people spread over the earth after the Flood but only after Babel which shortens the total time for the peopling of the earth a few hundred more years which is not insignificant when you are only saying that there are 4000 years available to begin with.
You might have already surmised that this creates some problems for how to understand the peopling of the Doggerland and native Floridians of the Ice Age? Add to this that for young earth creationists the ice age took place after the flood and by their estimates reached its maximum extend about 400-500 years after the flood and then quickly (just 100 years or so) significantly melted back to restore the sea level to something close to the current levels. If we take the date of the Tower of Babel (150-400 years) and the Ice Age (400-500) together we end up with some interesting creation model predictions about human migration. The most obvious expectation would be that migration must have been incredibly quick! For example, for Doggerland to become populated people would have had to have left Babel in the mid-east and then walked as fast as they could north to arrive in Doggerland in just a couple of hundred years and then probably established whole communities and maybe even set up some monuments etc.. only to have them all wiped out within 50 years at most (the first sea level rise would have wiped most of this area out. Not only did humans have to get here but all animals and plant communities had to establish themselves in a short period of time. But if the pollen cores tell an accurate story, at the peak of the ice age this area was not a lush green valley with abundant wildlife but rather quite tundra like. People likely wouldn’t have desired to move into this area until after it warmed up, but in the flood geology model that warming took place very quickly and so within 100 years the entire area would have become a sea again with no time to develop an entire community of temperate plants and animals.
I expect this time frame for human dispersal won’t sound all that difficult to some people but lets look at the case of the native Floridians. According to the creationists time-frame most of what was Florida was only eligible for human habitation for a very short period of time not long after the Flood. In this case how could extensive remains of human habitation be found below the waters of gulf of Mexico? Human dispersal from Babel must have been incredibly fast. Humans would have had to have left Babel traveled across Asia to the land bridge between Asia and North America in what is Alaska today. They then came across this land bridge during the time of the ice age and then made their way all the way across North America to Florida where they established communities just in time for the ocean to rise and cover them all. By most flood geology estimates of Babel and the events of the Ice Age, these people only had 100 to 250 years to make this great migration + community development. This is some incredible dispersal ability! When the Tower of Babel restriction is combined with evidence around the world of submerged populations we see that the flood geology model effectively has the entire globe being populated by people in just a few hundred years. And we are not just talking about a couple of people here and there but large populations and established sites of occupation.
Of course this is very different from the conventional picture of human dispersal that has been drawn by anthropologists. North and South America are portrayed as having been the last places that people found their way to coming here about 20,000 years ago at the maximum extent of the Ice Age. But in other places in the world, evidence of human occupation is found well before the last Ice Age. The evidence of humans under the Toba super volcano ash layer in India that I have written about earlier (The Toba Super-Eruption: A Non-Flood Catastrophe) are found underneath Ice Age deposits strongly implying that people dispersed over that area long before the Ice Age. This doesn’t seem possible in the flood geology models. The flood model also, by necessity, compresses all evidence of people groups from the past into populations living together as nearly contemporaries rather than displacing each other over time. This would include Neandertal’s, ‘the hobbit”, cro-magnons etc..in the flood model (a topic for another day). In North America there is evidence of hundreds of unique native american cultures many of which are very old but in the flood geology model all these hundreds of groups only lived within a few thousand years and so must have overlapped to a great extent.
Doggerland is an interesting find and I am sure we will learn much more about it in the future. Like all evidence of early man the timeline for when this land was inhabited is greatly compressed by creationists because of their global flood bottleneck but even more so by their insistence on a literal interpretation of population distributions at the time of Babel. This results in the need to propose ultra-fast dispersal of people over the entire earth while at the same time they experienced rapid cultural evolution. There are a multitude of problems this hypothesis creates when the evidence of human remains is examined.